There are at least two people who have mentioned having some issues with David Martin. That is OK, peeps. Do I look like a CENSOR? Noooooooo! You know, maybe I do, too! Do I trust people implicity? NOT VERY OFTEN. Do I trust David Martin? Not particularly. But I like what he's SAYING on this 2-part thang.
I want to be really clear here: If someone is talking about an issue or set of issues, and they're making SENSE, and they can back up what they say, and they can produce evidence to support whatever they're claiming, then I don't give a shit if they are a nice person or not, or a crook, a scoundrel, or even a politician... They can be SATAN himfuckingself! I. DONUT. CARE.
I am interested in INFORMATION, not a personality cult. (Unless we're talking about Captain Kirk.)
Just sayin'. If you donut like David Martin, FINE. I don't CARE about WHO, when it comes to providing good information, I care about THE INFORMATION. Period.
PLEASE, by all means, if you have evidence showing that WHAT Dr. Martin is SAYING in this video IS WRONG, please, please, SAY SOMETHING HERE. I am not going to get MAD. I am after the TROOF. Dat's all, doncha know. OK? OK, bye. And... Woof! Roof! Arrrrrra!
Totally agree on Makis. Shamefully putting *everything* he does behind a paywall makes me question his motives. I unsubscribed after the first couple weeks. We either believe in the truth and want everyone to hear it, or we really don't care about the truth and want people to pay for our version of it. Nah. I don't mind authors putting things behind a paywall, but if something is truly important it should be available to everyone regardless of their "ability to pay". Authors who want to get paid for their work need to be super good at what they do and also need to remember that before it was possible to put everything behind a paywall, newspapers could be accessed for free at libraries, laundromats, on a bus bench, etc. The authors of those publications didn't get paid by every person that read their verbiage. Sorry for the rant. You hit one of my pet peeves. lol.
I saw these interviews with David Martin and Rainer Fuelmilch early on. Made me think. So the virus was not new, the govt (DoD) got a lot of the patents, some obtained illegally. The govt paid Daszak and his Co and the lab in China. The bats live 10 and more miles away from the market.... dot dot dot. The military rolled out the jabs, which were ready before the virus even spread... and the deaths fell where a certain person was testing them. If all that does not ring a bell - you must be deaf! Next big rage on the market - hearing aids LOL
I read parts of Dr Makis but agree, that his posts should be free, if read-on;ly. Like MC MIller's. After all, they make a name on the death of people. It is bad enough for an undertaker. But a substacker should not charge to report deaths.
Dr David Martin is a very clever con-man. He has a business which uses a distinctly freemason logo and his connections with government agencies are intense. https://www.m-cam.com/about-us/
He is controlling the opposition to believe in viruses. This is essential to keep the public distracted away from the real root cause of Covid 19.
He is well educated in radiology. He knows that electro-magnetic radiation is dangerous for health. This tells me that he is working for the telecommunications industry to assist in promoting the virus theory so that telecoms may continue to erect their towers and sell us their weapons unimpeded.
I dare say he is making a small fortune. I refuse to listen to him.
There are at least two people who have mentioned having some issues with David Martin. That is OK, peeps. Do I look like a CENSOR? Noooooooo! You know, maybe I do, too! Do I trust people implicity? NOT VERY OFTEN. Do I trust David Martin? Not particularly. But I like what he's SAYING on this 2-part thang.
I want to be really clear here: If someone is talking about an issue or set of issues, and they're making SENSE, and they can back up what they say, and they can produce evidence to support whatever they're claiming, then I don't give a shit if they are a nice person or not, or a crook, a scoundrel, or even a politician... They can be SATAN himfuckingself! I. DONUT. CARE.
I am interested in INFORMATION, not a personality cult. (Unless we're talking about Captain Kirk.)
Just sayin'. If you donut like David Martin, FINE. I don't CARE about WHO, when it comes to providing good information, I care about THE INFORMATION. Period.
PLEASE, by all means, if you have evidence showing that WHAT Dr. Martin is SAYING in this video IS WRONG, please, please, SAY SOMETHING HERE. I am not going to get MAD. I am after the TROOF. Dat's all, doncha know. OK? OK, bye. And... Woof! Roof! Arrrrrra!
Totally agree on Makis. Shamefully putting *everything* he does behind a paywall makes me question his motives. I unsubscribed after the first couple weeks. We either believe in the truth and want everyone to hear it, or we really don't care about the truth and want people to pay for our version of it. Nah. I don't mind authors putting things behind a paywall, but if something is truly important it should be available to everyone regardless of their "ability to pay". Authors who want to get paid for their work need to be super good at what they do and also need to remember that before it was possible to put everything behind a paywall, newspapers could be accessed for free at libraries, laundromats, on a bus bench, etc. The authors of those publications didn't get paid by every person that read their verbiage. Sorry for the rant. You hit one of my pet peeves. lol.
I saw these interviews with David Martin and Rainer Fuelmilch early on. Made me think. So the virus was not new, the govt (DoD) got a lot of the patents, some obtained illegally. The govt paid Daszak and his Co and the lab in China. The bats live 10 and more miles away from the market.... dot dot dot. The military rolled out the jabs, which were ready before the virus even spread... and the deaths fell where a certain person was testing them. If all that does not ring a bell - you must be deaf! Next big rage on the market - hearing aids LOL
I read parts of Dr Makis but agree, that his posts should be free, if read-on;ly. Like MC MIller's. After all, they make a name on the death of people. It is bad enough for an undertaker. But a substacker should not charge to report deaths.
Maybe he's a controlled opposition? Maybe one reason he is still alive and moving freely?
Dr David Martin is a very clever con-man. He has a business which uses a distinctly freemason logo and his connections with government agencies are intense. https://www.m-cam.com/about-us/
He is controlling the opposition to believe in viruses. This is essential to keep the public distracted away from the real root cause of Covid 19.
He is well educated in radiology. He knows that electro-magnetic radiation is dangerous for health. This tells me that he is working for the telecommunications industry to assist in promoting the virus theory so that telecoms may continue to erect their towers and sell us their weapons unimpeded.
I dare say he is making a small fortune. I refuse to listen to him.
Check out the companies that his M-Cam business provides services for: https://www.m-cam.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Q1-2024-Reset-Draft.pdf - Big Pharma + Big Telecoms feature in every section.
Read this to understand the strategy Dr David Martin is part of....
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/what-does-1920-have-in-common-with